|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of deep water rice varieties |
|||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Pooja TO1: CR Dhan505 TO2: CR Dhan 506 TO3: CR Dhan 507 TO4:CR Dhan 508 |
|||||||
|
Results |
Technology option |
Grain Yield (q/ha) |
Test Wt. (g) |
Filled Grains/ panicle (No.) |
Panicle Length (cm) |
EBT/m2 (No.) |
Net Return (Rs/ha) |
B:C Ratio |
|
FP |
41.3 |
20.8 |
91 |
20.1 |
298 |
35490 |
1.60 |
|
|
TO1 |
42.5 |
21.1 |
94 |
20.2 |
301 |
38250 |
1.64 |
|
|
TO2 |
45.8 |
22.8 |
115 |
22.5 |
347 |
45840 |
1.77 |
|
|
TO3 |
43.1 |
22.1 |
98 |
20.8 |
319 |
39630 |
1.67 |
|
|
TO4 |
44.1 |
22.5 |
105 |
21.7 |
331 |
41930 |
1.70 |
|
|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of finger millet varieties for better yield |
||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Fallow land TO1: Arjun(OEB-526): Moderately resistant to leaf,neck and finger blast disease,duration-105-110,tolerant to dry spell of 10-12 days at vegetative and 6-8 days at reproductive stage. Yield(25-26 q/ha) TO2: Kalua-Semi-dwarf plant height and medium maturity, duration-110, can tolerate dry spell of 8-10 days at vegetative and 5-6 days at reproductive stage. (Yield-25.90 q/ha) TO3: OUAT Kalinga Ragi 1 (Shreeratna): Resistant to brown spot and foot rot, moderately resistance to blast , stem borer duration-117days,yield 24.16 q/ha |
||||||
|
Results |
Technology options |
Ear head (nos.)./m2 |
Grain Yield (q/ha) |
Gross Cost (Rs) |
Gross Return (Rs) |
Net return (Rs/ha) |
B:C Ratio |
|
FP |
59 |
8.6 |
25000 |
36894 |
11894 |
1.48 |
|
|
TO1 |
121 |
13.9 |
25000 |
59631 |
34631 |
2.39 |
|
|
TO2 |
114 |
11.2 |
25000 |
48048 |
23048 |
1.92 |
|
|
TO3 |
132 |
14.3 |
25000 |
61347 |
36347 |
2.45 |
|
|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of herbicides for weed management in Tomato |
|||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Manual weeding TO1: Pre emergence application of Pendimethalin (30% EC) 1kg/ha a.i followed by one hand weeding on30 Days after transplanting TO2: Pre emergence application of Metribuzin (70%WP) 750 g/ha a.i followed by one hand weeding on30 Days after Transplanting |
|||||||
|
Results |
Technology option |
No of weed/m2 |
No of fruits/plant |
Yield (q/ha) |
Cost of cultivation (Rs./ha) |
Gross return (Rs/ha) |
Net return (Rs./ha) |
BC ratio |
|
FP |
398.28 |
29.71 |
289.7 |
208116 |
434550 |
226434 |
2.08 |
|
|
TO1 |
95.85 |
41.14 |
323.28 |
202316 |
484920 |
282604 |
2.39 |
|
|
TO2 |
52.57 |
46.85 |
341.57 |
198326 |
512355 |
314029 |
2.58 |
|
|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of INM practices in Banana |
||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Application of fertilizer @ 200:100:100 g NPK/plant TO1: Application of 75% RDF (300:100:300 g NPK/plant) + 125 gm each of Azotobactor,Azospirillum & PSB (incubated in FYM) per plant TO2: Application of gypsum 1 kg/ plant + FYM 15 kg/ plant + recommended of N, P and 120% K per plant |
||||||
|
Results |
Technology option |
No. of fingers/bunch |
Bunch weight(kg) |
Yield (q/ha) |
Cost of cultivation (Rs./ha) |
Gross return (Rs/ha) |
Net return (Rs./ha) |
|
FP |
97.28 |
9.78 |
237.28 |
387815 |
681600 |
293785 |
|
|
TO1 |
122.14 |
12.14 |
269.5 |
422972 |
808500 |
385528 |
|
|
TO2 |
133.71 |
14.21 |
287.15 |
412815 |
861420 |
448605 |
|
|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of IDM modules for management of panama wilt in Banana |
||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Spraying of Carbendazim and Dimethoate TO1: Planting of disease-free suckers + apply lime @ 40 g/pit + neem cake @ 250 g/pit + vermicompost 500g + soil drenching of 0.2% Carbendazim 50WP at 2nd, 4th& 6th months after planting (MAP) + stem injection of Carbendazim 50WP @ 2-3 ml/plant (2g/l solution) at 3rd, 5th& 7th MAP TO2: Planting of disease free suckers + apply lime @ 40 g/pit + neem cake @ 250 g/pit + vermicompost 500 g + soil drenching of 0.1% (Trifloxystrobin + Tebuconazole 75 WP) solution at 2nd , 4th& 6th MAP + stem injection of (Trifloxystrobin + Tebuconazole 75WP) @ 2-3 ml/plant (1g/l solution) at 3rd , 5th& 7th MAP |
||||||
|
Results |
Technology Option |
Yield (q/ha) |
% increase in Yield |
Disease infestation % |
Gross return (Rs./ha) |
Net return (Rs./ha) |
B:C Ratio |
|
FP |
234.6 |
|
14 |
703800 |
321000 |
1.83 |
|
|
TO1 |
271.8 |
15.85 |
8 |
815400 |
408725 |
2.0 |
|
|
TO2 |
286.3 |
22.03 |
4 |
858900 |
449900 |
2.1 |
|
|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of Rhinoceros beetle management in Coconut |
||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Spraying of Chloropyriphos / Cypermethrin pesticides TO1: Application of Carbofuran 3G @ 33 kg/ha in manure pits, use of iron hooks, twice application of Chlorantraniliprole 0.4G @ 5g mixed with sand (1:2) in three innermost leaves of the plant at 6 months interval, installation of Rhinolure @12nos./ha TO2: Spraying of 250 ml of Metarrhizium anisopliae culture + 750ml of water in manure pit, use of iron hooks. Soak castor cake 1 kg/5L of water in small mud pots to attract and kill the adults and application of Neem seed powder + sand (1:2) @150 g at the base of the three inner leaves of the plant |
||||||
|
Results |
Technology option |
No. of trials |
Nuts yield |
Gross Cost (Rs) |
Gross return (Rs) |
Profit(Rs) |
B:C Ratio |
|
FP |
5 |
12328 |
96629 |
246560 |
149931 |
2.5 |
|
|
TO1 |
5 |
15288 |
104179 |
305760 |
201581 |
2.9 |
|
|
TO2 |
5 |
14196 |
99700 |
283920 |
184220 |
2.8 |
|
|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of various crop establishment methods in rice |
||||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Manual random transplanting TO1: Tractor drawn 9-row inclined plate planter for direct seeding of rice seeds TO2: Use of 4-row walk behind type rice transplanter |
||||||||
|
Results |
Technology Options |
Field Capacity (ha/h) |
Labour requirement (MDs/ha) |
Cost of Operation (Rs/ha) |
Yield (q/ha) |
Cost of Cultivation (Rs/ha) |
Gross Return (Rs/ha) |
Net Return (Rs/ha) |
B:C ratio |
|
FP |
0.005 |
30 |
20250 |
45 |
52000 |
90000 |
38000 |
1.73 |
|
|
TO1 |
0.4 |
0.41 |
9800 |
43 |
41550 |
86000 |
44450 |
2.06 |
|
|
TO2 |
0.143 |
2.32 |
14630 |
49 |
46380 |
98000 |
51620 |
2.11 |
|
|
Title of OFT |
Assessment of Tractor drawn rice straw Balers |
||||||
|
Details of Technologies |
FP: Burning of straw in field TO1: Collection of cut straw obtained by combine harvester for public sale to be used as cattle feed TO2:Tractor drawn round type Rice straw baler |
||||||
|
Results |
Technology Option |
Field capacity (ha/h) |
Baling capacity (No of bales/h) |
Avg. Weight of Bale (kg) |
Cost of bale Production (Rs/ha) |
Gross Income (Rs/ha) |
Net Income (Rs/ha) |
|
FP |
Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO1 |
0.04 |
- |
12 |
1248 |
|||